Turkish Thoracic Journal
Original Article

Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire: the ATA Study

1.

Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul-Turkey

2.

Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara-Turkey

3.

Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli-Turkey

4.

Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Medicine, Aydin-Turkey

5.

Mersin University, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin-Turkey

6.

Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey

7.

Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul-Turkey

8.

Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul-Turkey

9.

Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Sivas-Turkey

10.

Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir-Turkey

11.

Recep Tayip Erdoğan University Faculty of Medicine, Rize-Turkey,

12.

Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir-Turkey

13.

Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey

14.

Beykent University, Istanbul-Turkey

Turk Thorac J 0; 5: 0-0
DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.180186
Keywords : Asthma, Allergy
Read: 222 Downloads: 32 Published: 18 July 2019

Abstract

Objective: A multicenter trial was designed to validate the “Assessment Tools for Asthma” (ATA) questionnaire, a newly developed questionnaire, which evaluates both asthma control and risk factors associated with control in the one instrument.

 

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 810 cases from 14 clinics in 9 Turkish cities. The ATA questionnaire and Asthma Control Test (ACT) were administered. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the control status of 100 randomized cases. ATA is a physician-administered questionnaire including eight items. The ATA comprises two sections: the ATA1 querying symptomatic control criteria and the remaining section querying flare-up of asthma, control of comorbidities, treatment adherence, and inhaler technique.

 

Results: The mean scores for ATA1, ATA total, VAS, and ACT were 24.7±14.8, 53.8±19, 7.1±3, and 18.8±5.5, respectively. According to the ATA questionnaire, among all patients, 34.3% had controlled, 18.8% had partly controlled, and 46.9% had uncontrolled asthma. Further, 16.6% patients had flareups between visits, 96.4% patients had uncontrolled comorbidity, 17% patients had irregular asthma treatment, and only 8.4% patients used the incorrect inhaler technique. The ATA questionnaire showed internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.683). ACT, ATA1, and two specialists’ evaluations using VAS were highly correlated to ATA total scores; the Spearman correlation coefficient (r) values were 0.776, 0.783, and 0.909, and p values were p<.001, p<.001, and p<.001, respectively. According to ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis, the cut-off value of ATA was 50 (sensitivity=84.4%, specificity=82.40%).

 

Conclusions: The validated ATA questionnaire may be a practical tool for physicians in asthma management.

 

Cite this article as: Gemicioğlu B, Mungan D, Bavbek S, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire: the ATA Study. Turk Thorac J 2019; DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.180186

EISSN 2149-2530
3